Showing posts with label transliteracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label transliteracy. Show all posts

Friday, 4 April 2014

Assignment #3: The Interaction Between Digital Network Media, Publishing, & Society


By Jonathan Krywulak

 
The emergence of digital network media has transformed the 21st century society and its relationship with publishing institutions.   The expression and perception of social identities has been shaped by new forms of technology that spans cultural spheres and geographical boundaries allowing communication from many to many.  The increased speed, convenience and interactivity of new media have blurred the distinction between consumers and producers, providing people with the ability to be in control of their own media world.


 
References:

Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and
freedom. Yale University Press.
 
Tubella, I. (2004). Television and internet in the construction of identity. The Network Society: A
Cross-Cultural Perspective. Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edgard Elgar
Publishing Limited
 
Audio Clip #1:  Windows sounds mix by DJ Titon. Retrieved from http://youtu.be/cewQJFTolO0

Audio Clip #2:  Shirky, C. (2009) How social media can make history. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/clay_shirky_how_cellphones_twitter_facebook_can_make_history

Audio Clip #3: Lessig, L. Crash course in the "read-write" internet. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nBL8eClYuU

Audio Clip #4: Lessig, L. Creativity.  Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGWQVxrRXyU

Monday, 31 March 2014

Week 13: Distributive Publishing

Welcome #NMN students to the final week of our class.

We will be having our live chat Monday night 18:15 Mountain time (31st of March). Bring your questions about Assignment 3. You will have the week to complete the assignment.

You can find the assignment in our eclass moodle and via google docs.



Sunday, 30 March 2014

Jonathan Krywulak’s Storify: Transliteracy / Transmedia

COMM 597: New Media Narratives Course #NMN provided an explorative journey through the concepts of Transliteracy and Transmedia.   Through a mixture of articles, videos, blogs, tweets, images, and comments we were better able to grasp what it means to be Transliterate and the value associated with it.  My Storify provides a brief overview of Transliteracy and its relation to Transmedia Narratives, where people have the ability to create, curette, and consume content.


#NMN - #Transliteracy and #Digital Literacy

Wednesday, 26 March 2014

Diana Brown's Week #12 Review: Transliteracy

Here is my review of #transliteracy, which was an important #NMN course theme. I was able to find a range of sources across a variety of platforms (naturally!) about this topic. I think that this summary accurately captures what we learned about #transliteracy and builds on this topic with videos, tweets, blog entries, images, Facebook groups and slideshares. My #storify begins with working definitions of #transliteracy and moves into applications of #transliteracy in the realm of education. My storify ends with a thought-provoking quote about teaching and learning in our #transliterate 21st Century world. Enjoy!


Monday, 24 March 2014

Week 12: Review

This term has flown by and I've watched how you've all engaged with social media. I thought a great way to give a review of our term would be to "storify" the ebbs and flows of our discussions.

Now, I pass the Storify baton to you. For this week, as a way to review what you've learnt in the term, I would like you to create your own Storify. Here are some guidelines:


  1. Choose ONE theme from our course that resonates most with you (it might be #transliteracy, or #crowdsourcing or more traditional communications modes or the idea of the "book")
  2. Include a pertinent headline and mini-overview (as you can see in mine). Make sure to include our #NMN hashtag. 
  3. Include various modes such as images, tweets, blogs and videos. Have at least two of each. You should have at least 10 elements in your storify.
  4. Feel free to add in any text elements to elucidate or add context to a video or tweet (etc) that you're including.
  5. Embed your Storify in a blog post AND write 150-200 words that explain your topic and how it relates to our course.
  6.  You have the week (until Sunday) to work on your Storify review. 
  7. Let me know if you have any questions!






Sunday, 16 March 2014

Assignment 2 – Collective Intelligence

Bringing Nature to Kids through Technology

For this assignment I decided to look at the idea of using technology to help children experience nature. All three of the articles/ videos that I examined encompass the themes of nature, technobiophilia, and transliteracy.

In his TED talk “A teacher growing green in the South Bronx”, teacher Stephen Ritz talks about how he and his students teamed with Green Living Technologies, a company that develops technology for green roofs and green walls, in order to build an indoor edible wall in their South Bronx classroom. Green Living’s technology allows plants to grown in an urban setting, both inside and outside. Ritz states that the edible wall allowed all of his students to participate in this farming exercise. He says, “I wanted to figure out how I could get this kind of success into something small, like this, and bring it into my classroom so that handicapped kids could do it, kids who didn't want to be outside could do it, and everyone could have access…And lo and behold, we gave birth to the first edible wall in New York City” (Ritz, Jan. 2012). The food the students grew was served to students and teachers in the school cafeteria. Students were also encouraged to graze directly off the wall whenever they wanted. They had access to fresh vegetables during school hours that they grew themselves.

Ritz’s students were so inspired by their green wall, that they went on to build and design more walls and roofs, and they got paid for their efforts. Ritz discusses one case, which seems to embody technobiophilia, where his students designed and installed a green wall on the John Hancock building in Boston. Ritz states that “And my kids, from the poorest congressional district in America, became the first to install a green wall, designed by a computer, with real-live learning tools, 21 stories up” (Ritz, Jan. 2012). Some of Ritz’s students have become licensed Green Living installers, and have gone onto work with contractors in their neighborhood who build affordable housing. Through this introduction to green technology, and what they have learned about growing food, Ritz’s students have been able to transform their neighborhood, their school, and their future.

In her Ted talk “Using tech to enable dreaming” Shilo Shiv Suleman also discusses how children can use technology to enhance their experience with nature. Suleman states that she felt that technology was killing imagination. She felt that cellphones and digital cameras had “stopped us from dreaming. They stopped us from being inspired. And so I jumped…into this world of technology, to see how I could use it to enable magic as opposed to kill it” (Suleman, Dec. 2011).

Suleman did this by designing an interactive iPad app called Khoya, which allows children to become immersed in a digital fantasy adventure story. She states that she realized that the iPad was the perfect storytelling device – a transmedia storytelling device – because it could connect readers all over the world, plus the device can tell the way it’s being held, and it has a GPS so it can tell where the reader lives. She states that digital storytelling allows for transliteracy because “It brings together image and text and animation and sound and touch. Storytelling is becoming more and more multi-sensorial” (Suleman, Dec. 2011). In terms of technobiophilia, as part of the interactive digital story, readers are asked to go outside and take pictures with their iPad of nature – like flowers or leaves - and upload the photos online, where they can share with other readers around the world. Suleman states that “now with mobile technology, we can actually take our children outside into the natural world with their technology.” (Suleman, Dec. 2011). She feels that we are moving towards a world where nature and technology are becoming closer, stating that “We're bringing our children and ourselves closer to the natural world and that magic and joy and childhood love that we had through the simple medium of a story” (Suleman, Dec. 2011).

In her article “Get Your Students Outside With Technology”, Patty McGinnis discusses how technology, students and nature can be a ‘winning combination’. McGinnis writes how the creation on an interpretive trail helped her students interact with nature while using technology to “create a product that would be beneficial to the community” (McGinnis, p.59, 2014). This exercise allowed her students to become transliterate because it “addressed many 21st-century learning skills while making learning relevant and providing students with an authentic audience for their work” (McGinnis, p.59, 2014). Students were tasked with creating numbered posts that contained a quick response (QR) code to be placed along a nature trail. A QR code contains an embedded URL, that when scanned with a smart phone takes the user to a student created Web site. Each student made their own QR codes and created their own Web sites which contained text information, photos and student created videos explaining different points of interest along the trail.

During this exercise, students were required to become familiar with different types of technology, along with their life-sciences course content. Students were placed into small working groups, and each group had to record their point of interest along the trail on Google Sites. McGinnis explains that “Students were made editors of the site, which enabled them to add information about their point of interest to their page” (McGinnis, p.60, 2014). Students were encouraged to use "text, images, podcasts and videos when discussing their points of interest” (McGinnis, p.59, 2014) on their sites, plus they learned how to place a marker on their point of interest on Google Maps. This exercise seems like a great example also of Dr. Sue Thomas’s definition of technobiophilia, because students were encouraged to “achieve a ‘tech-nature’ balance through practical experiments designed to enhance…digital lives indoors, outdoors, and online” (Thomas, July 2013).

My Delicious site is: https://delicious.com/nawoods

References:
McGinnis, P. (2014). GET YOUR STUDENTS OUTSIDE WITH TECHNOLOGY!. Science Scope, 37(7), 58-64.

Ritz, S. (2012). A teacher growing green in South Bronx. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/stephen_ritz_a_teacher_growing_green_in_the_south_bronx

Suleman, S. (2011). Using tech to enable dreaming. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/shilo_shiv_suleman_using_tech_to_enable_dreaming?quote=1330

Thomas, S. (2013). Technobiophilia: Nature and Cyberspace. Retrieved from http://suethomasnet.wordpress.com/technobiophilia/

Monday, 10 March 2014

Week 10: Technobiophilia Guest Lecture from Professor Sue Thomas

Thank you so much to Professor Sue Thomas for the guest lecture this week. As usual, please respond with any comments, questions and answers to Sue's questions, in the comments' section below.



Technobiophilia: theory and practice
Dr Sue Thomas, www.suethomas.net, @suethomas
New Media Narratives 2014, University of Alberta, 10 March 2014


I’ve decided to present this material as a series of videos and weblinks along with questions for you to choose from and respond to in the comments section. It’s something of an experiment, so I hope it works! I look forward to discussing it with you online this week.



1. Watch the trailer for Biophilic Design: The Architecture of Life http://vimeo.com/27874539


Biophilic Design: The Architecture of Life (Trailer) from Tamarack Media on Vimeo.


Question:  Have you encountered an example of biophilic design in your own surroundings? If so, please describe it and any beneficial effect you experienced.

2. Watch this advertisement for Meetup.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhpf-CcPy-s


Question: Does the kind of life shown here resemble your own life or that of anyone you know? What are the features of this kind of life?

3. Read this discussion Does Technology destroy our relationship with Nature? http://www.ted.com/conversations/18068/does_technology_destroy_our_re.html

Question: What do you think are the most important points made in the discussion?

4.  In this article I outline my theory of technobiophilia and digital well-being. But the magazine editors gave it a title which is not what I was saying:  We surf the net, stream our films and save stuff in the cloud. Can we get all the nature we need from the digital world? http://aeon.co/magazine/nature-and-cosmos/can-we-get-all-the-nature-we-need-from-the-digital-world/  

Question:  Contrary to the article title, I don’t believe that we can get all the nature we need from the digital world. Do you? Why? Why not?

5. Watch this trailer for Flower, by ThatGameCompany. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJam5Auwj1E#t=34



Question: Do you think playing games like this can provide similar feelings to being out in nature?

6. At Medium I’m creating a collection of suggestions for ways to bring nature in our digital world. https://medium.com/how-to-bring-nature-into-your-digital-world You can also find it on my blog http://suethomasnet.wordpress.com/category/how-to-bring-nature-into-your-digital-world/

Question: If you have a Medium account, feel free to write an article and submit it to the collection for consideration. Or maybe you’d just like to add a suggestion to the blog?


Other materials which may be of interest

·      Technobiophilia website including articles, videos and bibliography: http://suethomasnet.wordpress.com/technobiophilia/


Monday, 3 March 2014

Week 9: Transmedia


Week 9: Transmedia
Required and Recommended Readings

Guest Lecture by Christy Deena
n  O'Flynn, S. (2012). Documentary's metamorphic form: Webdoc, interactive, transmedia, participatory and beyond. Studies In Documentary Film, 6(2), 141-157.




A bit about Christy Deena, our fantabulous guest-lecturer for this week.

Christy Dena is a writer-designer-director who has worked on award-winning pervasive games, film, digital and theatre projects. Clients include Nokia, Cisco/No Mimes Media, ABC, Wieden+Kennedy, Bangarra Dance Theatre, Noah Falstein, Ken Eklund & Agency of Coney, and many more.
Christy was granted Australia’s first Digital Writing Residency at The Cube for her project “Robot University,” funded by the Australia Council for the Arts and QUT. In 2012, she was the “Digital Writing Ambassador” for the Emerging Writers Festival; and a prototype of her project “AUTHENTIC IN ALL CAPS” was Finalist for “Best Writing in a Game” Award at the Freeplay Independent Gaming Festival. Christy co-wrote “The Writers Guide to Making a Digital Living” for the Australian Literature Board.
She has given keynotes and presentations at film, tech, writing, and gaming festivals worldwide, including Power to the Pixel (London), DIYDays (LA), TEDxTransmedia (Switzerland). She has mentored industry professionals around the world, including The Pixel Lab and Crossover; has written numerous articles on writing and design, and been published in numerous industry books. Christy was commissioned to run Transmedia Victoria, a key transmedia event in Melbourne bringing professionals from TV, film, performance, art, and gaming together.
She is Professor Adjunct at Creative Industries, QUT; Game Design Lecturer at SAE Brisbane; a Member of the International Academy of Television Arts and Sciences (Emmys); and a Board Member of the Entertainment Technology Press (ETC).
Christy has been a juror for the International Digital Emmy Awards, IPF Web Drama Series, and many other programs including the Australia Council for the Arts. She wrote the first PhD on Transmedia Practice, and wrote the definition of ‘transmedial fictions’ for the forthcoming The Johns Hopkins Encyclopedia of Digital Textuality. Christy has released her award-nominated web audio adventure for the iPad called AUTHENTIC IN ALL CAPS (with the crowdfunding campaign being the biggest successful campaign for a game on Pozible to date).  Her digital installation “Robot University” was launched at The Cube, QUT; and her playful story for the phone, “Guardians of Hidden Universes” was released at the first outdoor pervasive gaming festival: Popup Playground’s Fresh Air Festival.

Sunday, 16 February 2014

Week 7: Transliteracy

This week our theme is transliteracy. Along with the readings noted below, you may want to peruse what Professor Sue Thomas and last term's students discussed and wrote about the idea of transliteracy. Just search last term's blog for the tag "transliteracy."




Week 7: Transliteracy
Required and Recommended Readings
A background to transliteracy based on the founding article (“Transliteracy: Crossing Divides) and examples of transliteracy in practise.

n  Sue Thomas, Chris Joseph, Jessica Laccetti et al.,“Transliteracy: Crossing Divides,” Sue Thomas, “Nature of Transliteracy.”
n  #transliteracy on twitter
n  The Transliteracy Research Group blog, http://transliteracyresearch.wordpress.com/


“The ability to read, write and interact across a range of platforms, tools and media from signing and orality through handwriting, print, TV, radio and film, to digital social networks.”

The word “transliteracy” is derived from the verb “to transliterate,” meaning to write or print a letter or word using the closest corresponding letters of a different alphabet or language. 

The idea of transliteracy is really about promoting a unifying ecology. As Thomas explains, 
“The concept of transliteracy calls for a change of perspective away from the battles over print versus digital, and a move instead towards a unifying ecology not just of media, but of all literacies relevant to reading, writing, interaction and culture, both past and present.
 It is an opportunity to cross some hitherto quite difficult divides.” 
Transliteracy asks key questions about communication:
  1. How were people remembering and communicating for the thousands of years before writing?
  2. Where are the similarities with the way we communicate today?
  3. Has our addiction to print made us forget skills we had before?
  4. Can digital media reconnect us with those skills again?